[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/9] KVM: define kvm_bad_pfn statically
Marcelo, Paul,

Thanks for your review!

On 08/03/2012 08:01 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:15:27AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Remind me what is the guarantee that -Exxx does not clash with
>> a valid pfn number?
> A pfn number is an address >> PAGE_SHIFT, so it will have the top 12
> (at least) bits clear, whereas -Exxx will have the top bit set.


As this way is hard to understand and it will break huge memory support
on PAE 32bit cpu, i have used a new way in the v2:

Please review the new version.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-03 11:01    [W:0.044 / U:5.860 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site