lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: SLAVE Side SPI kernel driver development
    Date
    In my application in fact the slave is connected to the master without other 
    devices on the bus, a simple point to point, and receives a frame of known
    dimensions.
    I think I will be very busy to read post in the coming days :)

    Thanks to all of you who provided suggestions.
    Carlo Bastelli

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ned Forrester" <nforrester@whoi.edu>
    To: "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>
    Cc: "Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>;
    <spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net>; "Bastelli Carlo (yahoo)"
    <carlo_bastelli@yahoo.it>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>;
    <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
    Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 6:54 PM
    Subject: Re: SLAVE Side SPI kernel driver development


    On 08/24/2012 11:38 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
    > Dear Fabio Estevam,
    >
    >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Bastelli Carlo (yahoo)
    >
    > CCing SPI list
    >
    >> <carlo_bastelli@yahoo.it> wrote:
    >>> Hello, I'm Carlo, I have a difficult task at work, my boss asked me to
    >>> develop
    >>>
    >>> a driver SPI slave side on embedded ARM processor running Linux.
    >>>
    >>> Precisely linux occur on the SPI bus as a slave, not master as required
    >>> by the hierarchical structure of the current kernel. The new driver
    >>> will
    >>>
    >>> receive via interrupt and respond when selected by its chip select.
    >
    > So a soft-spi ? It's gonna be slow as hell and unstable too.
    >
    >>> Can
    >>> anyone suggest the best way to develop this driver?
    >
    > Get a CPU which has SPI-slave capable IP, start from there. If you were to
    > implement soft-spi this way, you'd have to use FIQ on ARM, to be able to
    > handle
    > stuff with reasonable latency ... check how the ps/2-gpio driver is done
    > in
    > Linux ... I tried it, it barely worked, you don't want to go down that
    > road.
    >
    >>> Personally, I
    >>>
    >>> have identified two main roads, the first if possible to exploit the
    >>> structure SPI master driver
    >
    > Not happening. You'd have to split the parts from the struct spi_master
    > into
    > common and master-only parts. That's for starters.
    >
    >>> with a few tricks that now I can not
    >>> define. The second most radical, write a driver for a UART like, but
    >>> managing the SPI device.
    >>> Thank you for any suggestions or examples.
    >
    > First of all, the SPI slave mode is COMPLETELY different from the master
    > mode.
    > You need to react on incoming CS-low ASAP, which might turn out to be a
    > problem
    > on it's own. Then, even if you do, you do not know how long the transfer
    > is
    > going to be, so you need to allocate enough buffers as the transfer
    > progresses
    > onwards.
    >
    > In case of your soft-spi, how do you plan to sample the CLK line to sync
    > clock?
    >
    >> Marek got spi slave running on a mx28. See his patch:
    >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg190860.html
    >
    > This was tested (and developed) on this board:
    > http://www.denx-cs.de/?q=M28
    >
    > The userland code is really easy too, simply pump it into spidev or read
    > from
    > it. But all that is only possible because of the SPI IP in the mx28 is
    > nice.
    >
    >> Regards,
    >>
    >> Fabio Estevam
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Marek Vasut

    I generally agree with the above comments. A generalized SPI slave must
    be able to respond instantly, often within one clock cycle. This can
    only work in hardware, or in an OS like Linux when the activity on the
    bus is completely predictable by the Linux slave. The only cases I know
    of are streaming of data in a predictable way between a single master
    and single slave (no other devices on the bus).

    This topic comes up periodically, but I don't think there has been any
    change in the situation for all the time I've followed the discussion.
    I recommend that you read the archives of this mailing list to
    understand the limitations of a potential slave mode. The archives can
    be found at:

    http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=spi-devel-general

    then look for threads with "slave" in the subject in the following
    months (I'd give thread start dates, but parts of the threads are
    disconnected in the archives, and this is the easiest way to see all the
    parts, day ranges are in parentheses):

    2007/04 (13-18)
    2007/09/27 and 2007/10 (13-17)
    2009/03 (2-3)
    2009/12/18 and 2010/1/19 and 2010/02 (14-16)
    2010/07 (26) and 2010/08 (13)
    2011/01 (28-31) and 2011/02 (1-10)
    2011/10 (18)
    2012/06 (29-30 and 2012/07 (1-17)

    --
    Ned Forrester nforrester@whoi.edu
    Oceanographic Systems Lab 508-289-2226 Office
    Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept.
    Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
    http://www.whoi.edu/
    http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=29856
    http://www.whoi.edu/hpb/Site.do?id=1532



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-08-25 10:21    [W:0.033 / U:0.728 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site