lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
>> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells:
>>>> How about this then?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT
>>>> config X86_32
>>>> def_bool !64BIT
>>>> select HAVE_AOUT
>>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
>>>>
>>>> config X86_64
>>>> def_bool 64BIT
>>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
>>>>
>>>> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
>>>> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT
>>>
>>> Looks sane.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
>
> Thanks, folded into David's original patch.


When will this be fixed in linux-next?

linux-next of 20120821 still fails.

thanks,
--
~Randy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-21 20:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site