lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: inux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (call-trace when suspending: PM?)
From
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20120820:
>>>
>>> The rr tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>>>
>>> The tip tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
>>> next-20120814.
>>>
>>> The workqueues tree gained a conflict against the hid tree.
>>>
>>> The drivers-x86 tree still has its build failure so I used the version
>>> from next-20120817.
>>>
>>> The signal tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I have still
>>> reverted 3 commits from the signal tree at the request of the arm
>>> maintainer.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have compiled linux-next (next-20120821) and see the attached
>> call-trace when suspending.
>> Suspending did NOT work (Xorg seems to cause it) - machine came back to desktop.
>>
>> With yesterday's next-20120820 I haven't seen this.
>>
>> I am not sure what is this causing... PM, x86/sched or even VFS?
>> Any help for debugging appreciated.
>>
>> I am on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 and use systemd-v43 as init-system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>
> Forgot attachment!
> If you don't succeed - try try try...
>
> - Sedat -

[ CC danvet ]

I have pulled in drm-intel-fixes into my local GIT tree and rebuilt
i915 - this seems to fix the problem.
Daniel any suggestion which patch in d-i-f did it?

[1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-fixes


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-21 14:01    [W:0.188 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site