lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/x86: enable Intel Cedarview Atom suppport
From
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> index 7f2739e..0d3d63a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> @@ -2008,6 +2008,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>> break;
>>
>> case 28: /* Atom */
>> + case 54: /* Cedariew */
>
> Ack. We currently miss some more 32nm Atoms too, will send patches soon.
>
>> memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, atom_hw_cache_event_ids,
>> sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
>> index 520b426..da02e9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
>> @@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
>> * to have an operational LBR which can freeze
>> * on PMU interrupt
>> */
>> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {
>> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 28
>> + && boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {
>
> Is that correct?
>
Yes, had to do that to re-enable LBR on Cedarview.
The < 10 is a trick to disable LBR on very old Atom (prior to N4xx generation).


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-20 12:41    [W:0.044 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site