[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] writeback: fix incorrect return value type of bdi_dirty_limit
Il 19/08/2012 12:23, Marco Stornelli ha scritto:
> Il 19/08/2012 04:17, Fengguang Wu ha scritto:
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 05:49:21AM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>>> unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned
>>> long dirty)
>>> Above function return type is unsigned long, but return value is
>>> kept in "u64 bdi_dirty".
>>> It can return incorrect value by type casting.
>> I don't see how the cast can return wrong value.
>> The u64 is necessary for the intermediate calculations.
>> Thanks,
>> Fengguang
> We are sure u64 is 8byte long, but unsigned long is 4byte long on 32-bit
> machine, so if bdi_dirty can assume values bigger than 2^32 there is an
> implicit truncate of its value, isn't it?
> Marco

Sorry but I didn't see the code, it seems not possible so the wrong
situation can't happen. Maybe we can simply add a comment, nothing more.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-19 13:21    [W:0.037 / U:5.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site