lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ 32/37] drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence
    On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:54:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:04 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
    > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
    [...]
    > > Good catch, I've forgotten to check whether all the recent ring_init
    > > patches have gone through cc: stable. For the stable team, please
    > > pick up both patches:
    > >
    > > f01db988ef6f6c70a6cc36ee71e4a98a68901229 and
    > > 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06
    > >
    > > Note that all kernels that need f01db backported also need
    > > b7884eb45ec98c0d34c7f49005ae9d4b4b4e38f6 (to fix a regression
    > > introduce by the former).
    >
    > 3.2.y already had the second and third of these, but not f01db98
    > 'drm/i915: Add wait_for in init_ring_common'. So I've added that.
    >
    > I don't have commit 18ef6f6c70a6cc36ee71e4a98a68901229 here, but I
    > assume it's a cherry-picked version as it has the same subject line.

    Ops sorry, yes, it's the same commit, just the hash was the version I
    had picked in my local branch, I did git show in the wrong tree.

    >
    > Ben.
    >
    > > Yeah, the ring init sequence is a fickle beast :( but I'm pretty sure
    > > with these three patches, stable kernels should be up to date and have
    > > all the latest fixes.
    > >
    > > Yours, Daniel
    >
    > --
    > Ben Hutchings
    > I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    []'s
    Herton


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-08-19 21:41    [W:0.023 / U:0.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site