Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:14:52 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / Runtime: Fix rpm_resume() return value for power.no_callbacks set |
| |
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > For devices whose power.no_callbacks flag is set, rpm_resume() > should return 1 if the device's parent is already active, so that > the callers of pm_runtime_get() don't think that they have to wait > for the device to resume (asynchronously) in that case (the core > won't queue up an asynchronous resume in that case, so there's > nothing to wait for anyway). > > Modify the code accordingly (and make sure that an idle notification > will be queued up on success, even if 1 is to be returned). > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > --- > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > +++ linux/drivers/base/power/runtime.c > @@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev > || dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE) { > atomic_inc(&dev->parent->power.child_count); > spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock); > + retval = 1; > goto no_callback; /* Assume success. */ > } > spin_unlock(&dev->parent->power.lock); > @@ -664,7 +665,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev > } > wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue); > > - if (!retval) > + if (retval >= 0) > rpm_idle(dev, RPM_ASYNC); > > out:
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
| |