Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:38:05 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > That was the case in the past, but IIRC PeterZ advocated not to and I > > agreed. > > Maybe you guys need to explain yourselves :) I mean, the dir is not > present so we're not overwriting anything. And since we say "O=..." on > the command line, it is actually expected that we really mean it... why > type it, otherwise?
Because you're an idiot and made a typo ;-) Happens to me all the time.
The regular kernel build doesn't create non-existent O= targets either iirc.
| |