[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms
    On 31/07/12 23:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
    > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:50:02PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    >> On Tuesday 31 July 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
    >>> I still fail to see how not having highmem enabled would ever cause memory
    >>> corruption errors (unless something dealing with memory in a very very
    >>> wrong way - iow, not using one of the reservation or memory allocation
    >>> methods provided by the kernel.)
    >> The problem is that all users of ux500 systems pass a command line like
    >> vmalloc=256M mem=128M@0 mali.mali_mem=32M@128M hwmem=168M@160M mem=48M@328M mem_issw=1M@383M mem=640M@384M
    >> This is of course totally bogus and should not be done. If I understand
    >> Lee correctly, one of the issues resulting from passing a command
    >> line like this without enabling highmem is memory corruption.
    > But the question is _why_ does that corruption happen.
    > From the above, we will end up with the kernel getting:
    > 0x00000000 - 0x07ffffff (128M @ 0)
    > 0x14800000 - 0x177fffff (48M @ 328M)
    > 0x18000000 - 0x3fffffff (640M @ 384M)
    > with:
    > 0x08000000 - 0x081fffff used for mali
    > 0x0a000000 - 0x147fffff used for hwmem
    > 0x17f00000 - 0x17ffffff used for mem_issw
    > Now, with highmem disabled, the kernel should still map exactly the
    > regions: 0x00000000 - 0x07ffffff, 0x14800000 - 0x177fffff, into the
    > direct mapped region, and truncate the 0x18000000 - 0x3fffffff
    > region appropriately, reducing the amount of memory available such
    > that it won't overlap the vmalloc area (which you've specified to be
    > a minimum of 256M.)
    > This should _NOT_ cause any memory corruption.
    > So, come on guys. Debugging is *mandatory* for this kind of problem.
    > Papering over it is obscene.

    Actually I didn't go any further with it, as I changed to another
    identical piece of hardware and couldn't reproduce the issue.

    FYI, here's the boot log from the broken board:

    Lee Jones
    Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
    Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-08-01 10:41    [W:0.025 / U:13.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site