[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
    On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

    > There's ongoing discussion about unifying ACPI and ftd representation,
    > and once that's done this isn't a problem, but right now there's no

    Where is this discussion?

    > terribly straightforward way to do this without a lot of basically
    > boilerplate code. The biggest issue is that ACPI has a very different
    > idea about event delivery and we'd need some way to abstract that.

    Right, but there's lots of bolierplate code with this stuff anyway and
    it's not fundamentally hard. Last time I looked at ACPI it had a rather
    different model for how all this stuff would work than DT did which
    isn't terribly helpful here.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-09 17:21    [W:0.021 / U:10.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site