[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> There's ongoing discussion about unifying ACPI and ftd representation,
> and once that's done this isn't a problem, but right now there's no

Where is this discussion?

> terribly straightforward way to do this without a lot of basically
> boilerplate code. The biggest issue is that ACPI has a very different
> idea about event delivery and we'd need some way to abstract that.

Right, but there's lots of bolierplate code with this stuff anyway and
it's not fundamentally hard. Last time I looked at ACPI it had a rather
different model for how all this stuff would work than DT did which
isn't terribly helpful here.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-09 17:21    [W:0.118 / U:2.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site