Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:40:24 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 14:23 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > It is not yet clear to me how and why your code converges. > > I don't think it does.. but since the scheduler interaction is fairly > weak it doesn't matter too much from that pov. > That is,.. it slowly moves along with the cpu usage, only if there's a lot of remote memory allocations (memory pressure) things get funny.
It'll try and rotate all tasks around a bit trying, but there's no good solution for a memory hole on one node and a cpu hole on another, you're going to have to take the remote hits.
Again.. what do we want it to do?
| |