[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction
    On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
    > +Note that although these are ACPI devices, we prefer to use PnP drivers
    > for them,
    > +this is because:
    > +1. all the non-ACPI-predefined Devices are exported as PnP devices as
    > well
    > +2. PnP bus is a well designed bus. Probing via PnP layer saves a lot of
    > work
    > + for the device driver, e.g. getting & parsing ACPI resources.

    (Nice BKM, thanks for sharing)

    I have few questions about using PnP drivers instead of pure ACPI drivers.

    ACPI 5.0 defined some new resources, for example "Fixed DMA descriptor"
    that has information about the request line + channel for the device to
    use. Hovewer, PnP drivers pass resources as 'struct resource', which
    basically only has start and end - how do you represent all this new stuff
    using 'struct resource'?

    Or should we use acpi_walk_resources() where 'struct resource' is not

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-06 08:01    [W:0.029 / U:8.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site