lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Changelog since V1
> o Expand some of the notes (jrnieder)
> o Correct upstream commit SHA1 (hugh)
>
> This series is related to the new addition to stable_kernel_rules.txt
>
> - Serious issues as reported by a user of a distribution kernel may also
> be considered if they fix a notable performance or interactivity issue.
> As these fixes are not as obvious and have a higher risk of a subtle
> regression they should only be submitted by a distribution kernel
> maintainer and include an addendum linking to a bugzilla entry if it
> exists and additional information on the user-visible impact.
>
> All of these patches have been backported to a distribution kernel and
> address some sort of performance issue in the VM. As they are not all
> obvious, I've added a "Stable note" to the top of each patch giving
> additional information on why the patch was backported. Lets see where
> the boundaries lie on how this new rule is interpreted in practice :).
>
> Patch 1 Performance fix for tmpfs
> Patch 2 Memory hotadd fix
> Patch 3 Reduce boot time on large machines
> Patches 4-5 Reduce stalls for wait_iff_congested
> Patches 6-8 Reduce excessive reclaim of slab objects which for some workloads
> will reduce the amount of IO required
> Patches 9-10 limits the amount of page reclaim when THP/Compaction is active.
> Excessive reclaim in low memory situations can lead to stalls some
> of which are user visible.
> Patches 11-19 reduce the amount of churn of the LRU lists. Poor reclaim
> decisions can impair workloads in different ways and there have
> been complaints recently the reclaim decisions of modern kernels
> are worse than older ones.
> Patches 20-21 reduce the amount of CPU kswapd uses in some cases. This
> is harder to trigger but were developed due to bug reports about
> 100% CPU usage from kswapd.
> Patches 22-25 are mostly related to interactivity when THP is enabled.
> Patches 26-30 are also related to page reclaim decisions, particularly
> the residency of mapped pages.
> Patches 31-34 fix a major page allocator performance regression
>
> All of the patches will apply to 3.0-stable but the ordering of the
> patches is such that applying them to 3.2-stable and 3.4-stable should
> be straight-forward.

I can't find any of these that should have gone to 3.4-stable, given
that they all were included in 3.4 already, right?

I've queued up the whole lot for the 3.0-stable tree, thanks so much for
providing them.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-26 01:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans