lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2
    On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:18:16PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
    > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
    > > FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though
    > > (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs).
    > >
    > > When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to
    > > make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because
    > > you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel.
    > >
    > Well do your job please.
    >

    I would suggest the user in question use the normal support channels for
    resolving a potentially SLES-specific bug.

    --
    Mel Gorman
    SUSE Labs


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-24 16:21    [W:0.023 / U:1.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site