[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:18:16PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith <> wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though
> > (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs).
> >
> > When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to
> > make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because
> > you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel.
> >
> Well do your job please.

I would suggest the user in question use the normal support channels for
resolving a potentially SLES-specific bug.

Mel Gorman

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-24 16:21    [W:0.060 / U:8.872 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site