Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:14:44 +0100 | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | [MMTests] Sysbench read-only on ext4 |
| |
Configuration: global-dhp__io-sysbench-large-ro-ext4 Result: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__io-sysbench-large-ro-ext4 Benchmarks: sysbench
Summary =======
Looking better in places than ext3 but still of concern.
Benchmark notes ===============
mkfs was run on system startup. No attempt was made to age it. No special mkfs or mount options were used.
sysbench is an OLTP-like benchmark. The test type was "complex" and read-only. The table size was 50,000,000 rows regardless of memory size but far exceeds the memory size of any of the test machines. sysbench was chosen because it's a reasonably complex OLTP-like benchmark with straight-forward prerequisites.
The backing database was postgres.
=========================================================== Machine: arnold Result: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__io-sysbench-large-ro-ext4/arnold/comparison.html Arch: x86 CPUs: 1 socket, 2 threads Model: Pentium 4 Disk: Single Rotary Disk ===========================================================
sysbench -------- Generally regresssed.
Swapping for kernels 3.1 and 3.2 is very high.
========================================================== Machine: hydra Result: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__io-sysbench-large-ro-ext4/hydra/comparison.html Arch: x86-64 CPUs: 1 socket, 4 threads Model: AMD Phenom II X4 940 Disk: Single Rotary Disk Status: Ok ==========================================================
sysbench -------- For low number of clients, this has generally improved.
Swapping in kernel 3.1 was high.
========================================================== Machine: sandy Result: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/mmtests-20120424/global-dhp__io-sysbench-large-ro-ext4/sandy/comparison.html Arch: x86-64 CPUs: 1 socket, 8 threads Model: Intel Core i7-2600 Disk: Single Rotary Disk Status: ==========================================================
Generally this is telling a much better story but this could be because of the much larger memory size of this machine offsetting some other regression.
Swapping in 3.1 and 3.2.
-- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
| |