lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] cpusets: dynamical scheduler domain flags
On 07/21/2012 12:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 17:03 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> This patch set provide a way for user to dynamically configure the scheduler
>> domain flags, which usually to be static.
>
> NAK.. you don't get to expose all this nonsense in a 'stable' ABI.
>
> You shouldn't need to prod at them to begin with.

So is that means expose those domain flags to user is a bad idea at all?

Is this caused by that people don't need such feature or this feature
has do harm to kernel's stability?(it could be not...)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-23 05:01    [W:1.120 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site