Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [trivial PATCH resend 2/2] ixgbe: use PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL | From | Jeff Kirsher <> | Date | Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:14:04 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 00:02 -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > Use PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL from pci_ids.h instead of creating its own > vendor ID #define. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> > Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> > Cc: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com> > Cc: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com> > Cc: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@intel.com> > Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> > Cc: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> > Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Same goes for this patch as well (not being trivial).
I already have several patches submitted for Dave against ixgbe currently and I am not sure if there would be any issues with this patch applying on top of the currently submitted patches. I will verify this applies cleanly with no issue to my current net-next tree before I send my ACK. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |