lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:52:58AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 16:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:53:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/staging/Kconfig between commit d0146d396bfa ("tcm_vhost: Initial
> > > merge for vhost level target fabric driver") from the target-merge tree
> > > and commit 15a4bc17b7f4 ("Staging: add CSR Wifi "os helper" module") from
> > > the staging tree.
> > >
> > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary.
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> > >
> > > diff --cc drivers/staging/Kconfig
> > > index 67ec9fe,e3402d5..0000000
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/Kconfig
> > > @@@ -132,6 -132,8 +132,10 @@@ source "drivers/staging/ipack/Kconfig
> > >
> > > source "drivers/staging/gdm72xx/Kconfig"
> > >
> > > + source "drivers/staging/csr/Kconfig"
> > > +
> > > + source "drivers/staging/omap-thermal/Kconfig"
> > > +
> > > +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
> >
> > Why is someone putting a non drivers/staging/ Kconfig file here in
> > drivers/staging/Kconfig? That's not ok at all.
> >
> > Target people, please just depend on CONFIG_STAGING if you want to do
> > that, but don't mess with files in the drivers/staging/ directory for no
> > good reason at all.
> >
>
> This was a request from MST (CC'ed) in order to have TCM_VHOST show up
> under the staging configuration options..

If you really want it to show up there, then send me a patch adding the
code to drivers/staging/. Otherwise it really makes no sense.

> If that's really not what should be done, I'm happy to drop this part
> and just use CONFIG_STAGING again.

Why are you wanting to depend on CONFIG_STAGING in the first place?
What is wrong with the code that it can't be merged "properly" now?
Don't use CONFIG_STAGING as a "crutch" unless you really need it.

thanks,

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-20 20:41    [W:0.781 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site