[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: setup pageblock_order before it's used by sparse
    On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 20:25 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
    > > That means pageblock_order is always set to "MAX_ORDER - 1", not sure
    > > whether this is intended. And it has the same issue as IA64 of wasting
    > > memory if CONFIG_SPARSE is enabled.
    > adding BenH, need to know if it is powerpc intended.
    > >
    > > So it would be better to keep function set_pageblock_order(), it will
    > > fix the memory wasting on both IA64 and PowerPC.
    > Should setup pageblock_order as early as possible to avoid confusing.

    Hrm, HPAGE_SHIFT is initially 0 because we only know at runtime what
    huge page sizes are going to be supported (if any).

    The business with pageblock_order is new to me and does look bogus today
    indeed. But not a huge deal either. Our MAX_ORDER is typically 9 (64K
    pages) or 13 (4K pages) and our standard huge page size is generally 16M
    so there isn't a big difference here.

    Still, maybe something worth looking into...


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-18 10:01    [W:0.024 / U:42.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site