[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 5/5] vhost-blk: Add vhost-blk support
    On 07/18/2012 10:31 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
    > Asias He <> writes:
    >> On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
    >>> Asias He <> writes:
    >>>> vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
    >>>> This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
    >>>> improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
    >>>> host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60% performance
    >>>> improvement compared to Liu Yuan's implementation.
    >>> So, first off, some basic questions. Is it correct to assume that you
    >>> tested this with buffered I/O (files opened *without* O_DIRECT)?
    >>> I'm pretty sure that if you used O_DIRECT, you'd run into problems (which
    >>> are solved by the patch set posted by Shaggy, based on Zach Brown's work
    >>> of many moons ago). Note that, with buffered I/O, the submission path
    >>> is NOT asynchronous. So, any speedups you've reported are extremely
    >>> suspect. ;-)
    >> I always used O_DIRECT to test this patchset. And I mostly used raw
    >> block device as guest image. Is this the reason why I did not hit the
    >> problem you mentioned. Btw, I do have run this patchset on image based
    >> file. I still do not see problems like IO hangs.
    > Hmm, so do the iovec's passed in point to buffers in userspace? I
    > thought they were kernel buffers, which would have blown up in
    > get_user_pages_fast.

    Yes. The iovec's passed in point to userspace buffers. ;-)


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-18 17:22    [W:0.052 / U:13.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site