Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:55:40 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree |
| |
On 16/07/12 14:00, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>> What I am afraid of is: tentative solutions tend to stay, because the >>> need for a proper solution is reduced. Yet, finding proper generic >>> bindings might take some time which doesn't meet the high pressure >>> around DT at the moment. >> >> I agree with what you say to some extent, but I believe that it is >> more important to have a working solution now than to ensure that >> each bindings are as unique as possible. After any suggestion of >> consolidation, a move from vendor specific to generically defined >> Device Tree bindings is trivial. Especially in the current stage >> where adaptions and definitions are still fluid. > > See my response to Linus. I do understand your view and where it comes > from. As a maintainer, I have other priorities. No offence involved, > it needs some settlement.
I'm certainly not adverse to doing this, although I'd prefer it was completed in the short-term. So should we do it?
-- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |