Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: resurrecting tcphealth | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:32:37 +0100 |
| |
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 09:56 +0200, Piotr Sawuk wrote: > On Sa, 14.07.2012, 03:31, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:55:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger said: > > > >> >+ /* Course retransmit inefficiency- this packet has been received > >> twice. */ > >> >+ tp->dup_pkts_recv++; > >> I don't understand that comment, could you use a better sentence please? > > > > I think what was intended was: > > > > /* Curse you, retransmit inefficiency! This packet has been received at > least twice */ > > > > LOL, no. I think "course retransmit" is short for "course-grained timeout > caused retransmit" but I can't be sure since I'm not the author of these > lines. I'll replace that comment with the non-shorthand version though. > however, I think the real comment here should be: [...]
The word you are looking for is 'coarse' not 'course' (they are generally pronounced the same, to confuse you).
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
| |