Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:00:15 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree |
| |
> >What I am afraid of is: tentative solutions tend to stay, because the > >need for a proper solution is reduced. Yet, finding proper generic > >bindings might take some time which doesn't meet the high pressure > >around DT at the moment. > > I agree with what you say to some extent, but I believe that it is > more important to have a working solution now than to ensure that > each bindings are as unique as possible. After any suggestion of > consolidation, a move from vendor specific to generically defined > Device Tree bindings is trivial. Especially in the current stage > where adaptions and definitions are still fluid.
See my response to Linus. I do understand your view and where it comes from. As a maintainer, I have other priorities. No offence involved, it needs some settlement.
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |