lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] Organising Mini Summits within the Kernel Summit
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:09:15AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have set aside the second day of the kernel summit (Tuesday 28
> August) as mini-summit day. So far we have only the PCI mini summit on
> this day, so if you can think of other topics, please send them to the
> kernel summit discuss list:
>
> ksummit-2012-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
>
> Looking at the available rooms, we think we can run about four or five
> mini summits.
>
> As an added incentive, mini summit organisers get to pick who they
> invite and all the people they pick will get an automatic invitation to
> the third day of the kernel summit (but not the core first day) and the
> evening events.

OK, so far I believe I've heard concrete suggestions from identified
(or fairly well identified :-) stuckees willing to organize
mini-summits for:

* ARM
* Media
* PCI
* memcg

I may have missed some, so if people could send a message to the
discuss list with [MINI-SUMMIT] in the subbject line and the name of
the proposed mini-summit, that would be really helpful. Please
indicate whether you are volunteering to help organize the proposed
mini-summit, or identify someone you think can be volunteered. :-)

Things that we will be asking the mini-summit chars to determine, in
addition to who should be given invites for Tuesday and Wednesday is
an estimate of how much time you need, and a list of sub-topics (and
who might lead the sub-topic discussion). We will be asking you to
create a fairly well-defined schedule, with 30 and 60 minute slots, so
that we can publish a schedule and so that people who might need to
hop between mini-summits, have a chance to do so. So please start
thinking about how long each of your sub-topics will need to be, and
who might be needed for a particular sub-topic's discussion to be
successful. There may be a number of developers, with fingers in
multiple subsystem, where scheduling may become a bit of a challenge.

Thanks!!

- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-13 20:21    [W:0.128 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site