[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ARM: why smp_mb() is not needed in the "__mutex_fastpath_lock" and "__mutex_fastpath_unlock" functions
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:10:52AM +0100, shan kang wrote:
> For example, in the following scenario, Process2 may get the wrong value;
> Process1:
> mutex_lock(&lock);
> write data; (store operation)
> mutex_unlock(&lock);
> Process2:
> mutex_lock(&lock);
> read data; (load operation)
> mutex_unlock(&lock);

Yes, it looks like we can screw things up in the uncontended case (where
nobody blocks on the mutex). We could add an smp_mb after the lock operation
and another one before the unlock, but I'm tempted just to use
asm-generic/mutex-dec.h instead. The latter approach will subtly change the
current behaviour, so I'll post a patch when I'm happy with it.

Curious: did you find this by inspection or did you observe it going wrong?



 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-13 12:21    [W:0.052 / U:5.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site