Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:43:10 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 36/40] autonuma: page_autonuma |
| |
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:24:05AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > I think you are better using a different name. > > Perhaps 'if (autonuma_on())'
I changed it to AUTONUMA_POSSIBLE_FLAG/autonuma_possible() and optimized the implementation to a single test_bit on the read mostly flag variable.
"possible" is the term all NUMA code in the kernel already uses with almost the same meaning (modulo noautonuma parameter) as num_possible_nodes() etc...
| |