Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] panel: Use pr_err(...) rather than printk(KERN_ERR ...) | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:43:08 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:22 +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote: > On 12/07/12 12:35, Toshiaki Yamane wrote: > > This change is inspired by checkpatch. > > Your changelog needs to describe all of the changes you are making. The > subject line only describes one. This patch is doing the following: > > - Converting printk(KERN_ERR to pr_err > - Adding __func__ prefixes to printk lines > - Refactoring split printk strings onto a single line > > There are a few other printks in this file which could be converted to > pr_* to make the code more consistent. Perhaps a follow up patch? > > Typically for a sub-sequent version of a patch/series you should list > the changes since the last round. Put these below the --- so that they > don't become part of the change log, e.g.: > > Signed-off-by: Your name/email here > --- > > Changes since v2: > - Some stuff > > Changes since v1: > - Some other stuff > > Some more comments below.
And ideally cc the people that gave you notes/comments on your previous patches too.
| |