lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH v2 2/3] acpi : prevent cpu from becoming online
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance
to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using
get/put_online_cpus().

Why does the patch change _cpu_up() logic?

The patch cares the race of hot-remove cpu and _cpu_up(). If the patch
does not change it, there is the following race.

hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up()
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
call acpi_processor_handle_eject() |
call cpu_down() |
call get_online_cpus() |
| call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here
call arch_unregister_cpu() |
call acpi_unmap_lsapic() |
call put_online_cpus() |
| start and continue _cpu_up()
return acpi_processor_remove() |
continue hot-remove the cpu |

So _cpu_up() can continue to itself. And hot-remove cpu can also continue
itself. If the patch changes _cpu_cp() logic, the race disappears as below:

hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up()
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
call acpi_processor_handle_eject() |
call cpu_down() |
call get_online_cpus() |
| call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here
call arch_unregister_cpu() |
call acpi_unmap_lsapic() |
cpu's cpu_present is set |
to false by set_cpu_present()|
call put_online_cpus() |
| start _cpu_up()
| check cpu_present() and return -EINVAL
return acpi_processor_remove() |
continue hot-remove the cpu |

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

---
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 12 ++++++++++++
kernel/cpu.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2012-07-10 13:58:20.862931557 +0900
+++ linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c 2012-07-10 14:05:46.318365136 +0900
@@ -850,8 +850,18 @@ static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(s
return ret;
}

+ get_online_cpus();
+ /*
+ * Someone might online the cpu again at this point. So we check that
+ * cpu has been onlined or not. If cpu is online, it returns -EBUSY.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(cpu_online(pr->id))) {
+ put_online_cpus();
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr->id);
+ put_online_cpus();
return ret;
}
#else
Index: linux-3.5-rc6/kernel/cpu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.5-rc6.orig/kernel/cpu.c 2012-07-08 09:23:56.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-3.5-rc6/kernel/cpu.c 2012-07-10 14:15:26.065113805 +0900
@@ -343,11 +343,14 @@ static int __cpuinit _cpu_up(unsigned in
unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
struct task_struct *idle;

- if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
- return -EINVAL;
-
cpu_hotplug_begin();

+ if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+
idle = idle_thread_get(cpu);
if (IS_ERR(idle)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(idle);


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-10 08:41    [W:0.049 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site