[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH, RESEND] fs: push rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() to filesystems
    On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:02:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 00:41:03 +0300
    > "Kirill A. Shutemov" <> wrote:
    > > There's no reason to call rcu_barrier() on every deactivate_locked_super().
    > > We only need to make sure that all delayed rcu free inodes are flushed
    > > before we destroy related cache.
    > >
    > > Removing rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() affects some
    > > fas paths. E.g. on my machine exit_group() of a last process in IPC
    > > namespace takes 0.07538s. rcu_barrier() takes 0.05188s of that time.
    > What an unpleasant patch. Is final-process-exiting-ipc-namespace a
    > sufficiently high-frequency operation to justify the change?

    > I don't really understand what's going on here. Are you saying that
    > there is some filesystem against which we run deactivate_locked_super()
    > during exit_group(), and that this filesystem doesn't use rcu-freeing
    > of inodes? The description needs this level of detail, please.

    I think the rcu_barrier() is in wrong place. We need it to safely destroy
    inode cache. deactivate_locked_super() is part of umount() path, but all
    filesystems I've checked have inode cache for whole filesystem, not

    > The implementation would be less unpleasant if we could do the
    > rcu_barrier() in kmem_cache_destroy(). I can't see a way of doing that
    > without adding a dedicated slab flag, which would require editing all
    > the filesystems anyway.

    I think rcu_barrier() for all kmem_cache_destroy() would be too expensive.

    > (kmem_cache_destroy() already has an rcu_barrier(). Can we do away
    > with the private rcu games in the vfs and switch to

    Kirill A. Shutemov
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-09 00:41    [W:0.025 / U:8.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site