lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output
The tests here aren't correct.  It should be doing a shift before doing
the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and
(bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking
for locked.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a
response.

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
@@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);

seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
- bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
- bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
+ test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ?
+ "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
+ test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ?
+ "LOCKED" : "------"
);
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-08 15:21    [W:0.042 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site