[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes
    On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Al Viro <> wrote:
    > Frankly, I would very much prefer to have the same locking rules wherever
    > possible.  The locking system is already overcomplicated and making its
    > analysis fs-dependent as well... <shudder>

    I do agree that it would be better if we avoid it. I was just trying
    to explain that the dentry locking is *not* enough, for the simple
    reason that it relies on upper-level non-dentry locking just to work.

    Your patch looks good, but whether it works I have no idea ;)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-08 03:41    [W:0.025 / U:3.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site