lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural
    On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 07:10:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > How about newer unknown Intel CPUs with arch_perfmon >= 3? Those would get
    > > intel_pmu, correct? There's no guarantee that they support the trick.
    >
    > But they will have no PEBS constraints set, so effectively don't have
    > PEBS.

    Ok. I see you want to do it tricky instead of obvious.

    -Andi

    --
    ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-06 20:21    [W:0.020 / U:30.416 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site