lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:23 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
    >
    > But it's very clear this cannot be done without a model check.
    > I don't understand how you can even argue against that.

    Who said I fixed it without a model check?

    But simply disabling it for a model isn't how you do things.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-06 17:41    [W:3.819 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site