Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural
From
Peter Zijlstra <>
Date
Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:28:30 +0200
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:23 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > But it's very clear this cannot be done without a model check. > I don't understand how you can even argue against that.
Who said I fixed it without a model check?
But simply disabling it for a model isn't how you do things.