lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86 mce: use new printk recursion disabling interface
From
Date
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:15 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:55:22PM +0800, ShuoX Liu wrote:
> > From: ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > On x86 machines, some times MCE happens just when kernel calls printk
> > to output some log info to serial console, while usually MCE module in
> > kernel is used to print out some hardware error information, such like
> > bad cache or bad memory bank. That causes printk recursion and printk
> > would omit MCE printk output.
> >
> > We hit it when running MTBF testing on Android ATOM mobiles.
> >
> > Here in mce_panic, we choose to disable printk recursion to make sure
> > MCE logs printed out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > index 2afcbd2..906e838 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static void mce_panic(char *msg, struct mce *final, char *exp)
> > {
> > int i, apei_err = 0;
> >
> > + printk_recursion_check_disable();
> > if (!fake_panic) {
> > /*
> > * Make sure only one CPU runs in machine check panic
> > @@ -360,6 +361,7 @@ static void mce_panic(char *msg, struct mce *final, char *exp)
> > panic(msg);
> > } else
> > pr_emerg(HW_ERR "Fake kernel panic: %s\n", msg);
> > + printk_recursion_check_enable();
>
> Ok, let me ask this again: why not disable the printk recursion check in
> the function that actually _prints_ the MCE, i.e. print_mce() instead of
> here in mce_panic() which does a whole bunch of other stuff and it can
> also return without printing any MCE to dmesg?
Sorry for forgetting the return checking.

> Are you interested in seeing the printk's from mce_panic? Why?
How about moving the disabling checking in print_mce? It seems not clean if we disable
the printk recursion checking just around every printk statement.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-06 03:01    [W:0.108 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site