Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:48:20 +0900 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks | From | Tomoya MORINAGA <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2 > tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
I understand your saying. Looks good. However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system. So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.
thanks. tomoya
| |