[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Some vmevent fixes...
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<> wrote:
>> Note that 1) and 2) are not problems per se, it's just implementation
>> details, easy stuff. Vmevent is basically an ABI/API, and I didn't
>> hear anybody who would object to vmevent ABI idea itself. More than
>> this, nobody stop us from implementing in-kernel vmevent API, and
>> make Android Lowmemory killer use it, if we want to.
> I never agree "it's mere ABI" discussion. Until the implementation is ugly,
> I never agree the ABI even if syscall interface is very clean.

I don't know what discussion you are talking about.

I also don't agree that something should be merged just because the
ABI is clean. The implementation must also make sense. I don't see how
we disagree here at all.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-05 10:21    [W:0.139 / U:5.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site