[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Some vmevent fixes...
    On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
    <> wrote:
    >> Note that 1) and 2) are not problems per se, it's just implementation
    >> details, easy stuff. Vmevent is basically an ABI/API, and I didn't
    >> hear anybody who would object to vmevent ABI idea itself. More than
    >> this, nobody stop us from implementing in-kernel vmevent API, and
    >> make Android Lowmemory killer use it, if we want to.
    > I never agree "it's mere ABI" discussion. Until the implementation is ugly,
    > I never agree the ABI even if syscall interface is very clean.

    I don't know what discussion you are talking about.

    I also don't agree that something should be merged just because the
    ABI is clean. The implementation must also make sense. I don't see how
    we disagree here at all.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-05 10:21    [W:0.023 / U:2.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site