[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170()
    On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Dave Jones <> wrote:
    > running just over two hours with that commit reverted with no obvious ill effects so far.

    And how quickly have you usually seen the problems? Would you have
    considered two ours "good" in your bisection thing?

    Also, just to check: Hugh sent out a patch called "mm: fix warning in
    __set_page_dirty_nobuffers". Is that applied in your tree too, or did
    the __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() warning go away with just the revert?

    I'm just trying to figure out exactly what you are testing. When you
    said "test with that (and Hugh's last patch) backed out", the "and
    Hugh's last patch" part was a bit ambiguous. Do you mean the trial
    patch in this thread (backed out) or do you mean "*with* Hugh's patch
    for the __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() warning".


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-04 00:21    [W:0.021 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site