lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: add regulator and GPIO support
On 06/29/2012 07:22 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Add support for an optional power regulator and enable/disable GPIO.
> This scheme is commonly used in embedded systems.

> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c

> - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "got pwm for backlight\n");
> -

That seems like an unrelated change?

> @@ -231,6 +271,22 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)
> pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns);
>
> +
> + pb->power_reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");

There's an extra blank line there.

> + if (IS_ERR(pb->power_reg))
> + return PTR_ERR(pb->power_reg);
> +
> + pb->enable_gpio = -EINVAL;
> + if (data->use_enable_gpio) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, data->enable_gpio,
> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "backlight_enable");
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> + "error %d requesting control gpio\n", ret);

Shouldn't that be a hard error? If the user specified that some GPIO be
used, and the GPIO could not be requested, shouldn't the driver fail to
initialize?

> + else
> + pb->enable_gpio = data->enable_gpio;

Aside from that, this looks good to me.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-29 18:41    [W:0.201 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site