Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:16:28 +0530 | | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: use clk_disable_unprepare in place of clk_disable |
| |
Stephen,
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 09:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/20/2012 10:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 06/20/2012 06:56 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> Use clk_disable_unprepare() inplace of clk_disable(). >>> This was missed as part of moving clock enable/disable to >>> prepare/unprepare for using the common clock framework. > ... >> I see no reason not to take the second patch in the series through the >> I2C tree though. > Uggh. Ignore that paragraph - the other patch was sent separately not as > a series.
so are you taking care of this patch or do I need to send the patch based on your tree in place of linux-next?
|  |