lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
    On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0530, Rajeev kumar wrote:

    > 3. We can pick the patches circulated by Viresh Kumar where we don't
    > have HAVE_CLK defined for x86_64, then the inline routines like
    > following should come into play:

    This is what *should* be happening, in conjunction with architectures
    doing the trivial work required to turn the clock API on now that there
    is a generic clock API, but both of these things seem to be going
    nowhere. I've applied a bodge until someone decides it's worth applying
    the stubs.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-25 11:41    [W:0.023 / U:0.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site