Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:03:40 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree |
| |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0530, Rajeev kumar wrote:
> 3. We can pick the patches circulated by Viresh Kumar where we don't > have HAVE_CLK defined for x86_64, then the inline routines like > following should come into play:
This is what *should* be happening, in conjunction with architectures doing the trivial work required to turn the clock API on now that there is a generic clock API, but both of these things seem to be going nowhere. I've applied a bodge until someone decides it's worth applying the stubs. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |