lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0530, Rajeev kumar wrote:

> 3. We can pick the patches circulated by Viresh Kumar where we don't
> have HAVE_CLK defined for x86_64, then the inline routines like
> following should come into play:

This is what *should* be happening, in conjunction with architectures
doing the trivial work required to turn the clock API on now that there
is a generic clock API, but both of these things seem to be going
nowhere. I've applied a bodge until someone decides it's worth applying
the stubs.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-25 11:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans