lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpufeature: Rename X86_FEATURE_DTS to X86_FEATURE_DTHERM
On 06/24/2012 01:39 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> It isn't about finger-pointing, it is about a failure of process; we had
> a process that would have caught this problem and the process failed.
> There are certainly blame enough to go around, but I think one of the
> things here is that lack of response isn't necessary an ACK - it may
> actually be that the patch looked at first glance like it had no impact
> on our area (incorrectly as it turned out.)
>

Let me be clear: I'm not blaming you, or anyone else, personally. Like
many other failures, there were a number of steps in the chain here, one
of them being not checking this in the script from the beginning, and
that one is mine.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-24 23:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans