Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:59:37 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpufeature: Rename X86_FEATURE_DTS to X86_FEATURE_DTHERM |
| |
On 06/24/2012 01:39 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > It isn't about finger-pointing, it is about a failure of process; we had > a process that would have caught this problem and the process failed. > There are certainly blame enough to go around, but I think one of the > things here is that lack of response isn't necessary an ACK - it may > actually be that the patch looked at first glance like it had no impact > on our area (incorrectly as it turned out.) >
Let me be clear: I'm not blaming you, or anyone else, personally. Like many other failures, there were a number of steps in the chain here, one of them being not checking this in the script from the beginning, and that one is mine.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|  |