[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system
On 06/22/2012 09:26 AM, Nix wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2012, Borislav Petkov uttered the following:
>> I know, right. Whose idea was it to do it like that I don't know.
>> AFAICT, Intel delivers ucode as a single blob too, so why split it? The
>> driver picks out the right blob anyway.
> Only if supplied over the old interface. Over the new interface,
> we just see
> microcode: error! Bad data in microcode data file
> in the log. So clearly the driver doesn't know how to split up the
> microcode.bin that Intel provides, and (until Henrique's iucode-tool or
> something like it becomes ubiquitous) the old interface, and
> microcode_ctl, cannot be removed.

Even more importantly, to do early microcode updates we need to stash
away not just the current CPU's microcode but any compatible CPU's
microcode, so just loading a single one is not going to work...



 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-22 21:01    [W:0.095 / U:8.712 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site