[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system
    On 20 Jun 2012, Borislav Petkov uttered the following:
    > I know, right. Whose idea was it to do it like that I don't know.
    > AFAICT, Intel delivers ucode as a single blob too, so why split it? The
    > driver picks out the right blob anyway.

    Only if supplied over the old interface. Over the new interface,
    we just see

    microcode: error! Bad data in microcode data file

    in the log. So clearly the driver doesn't know how to split up the
    microcode.bin that Intel provides, and (until Henrique's iucode-tool or
    something like it becomes ubiquitous) the old interface, and
    microcode_ctl, cannot be removed.

    NULL && (void)

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-22 20:01    [W:0.024 / U:18.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site