[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Minimal build without libelf dependency (v2)
    Hi Peter,

    2012-06-22 (금), 11:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra:
    > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 14:37 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
    > > And then I realized that the perf record needs to know about the
    > > build-id's anyway. :( So I implemented a poor man's version of elf
    > > parser only for parsing the build-id info.
    > Why? the very first versions didn't know about any of that nonsense :-)
    > It works just fine as long as you don't go change binaries around.
    > That said, you did the work already, so no objection, just saying
    > builtids aren't that important.

    I'm not sure I understood you correctly. But 'perf record' needs to know
    about the build-id's to save them to for 'perf report' later.
    And 'perf archive' also needs to know about them to select necessary
    binaries for the session.

    Namhyung Kim

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-22 17:42    [W:0.022 / U:11.832 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site