lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: clean up force_empty_list() return value check
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:59:44 +0900
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

>
> By commit "memcg: move charges to root cgroup if use_hierarchy=0"
> mem_cgroup_move_parent() only returns -EBUSY, -EINVAL.
> So, we can remove -ENOMEM and -EINTR checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 5 -----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index cf8a0f6..726b7c6 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3847,8 +3847,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>
> ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR)
> - break;
>
> if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) {

This looks a bit fragile - if mem_cgroup_move_parent() is later changed
(intentionally or otherwise!) to return -Esomethingelse then
mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() will subtly break. Why not just do

if (ret < 0)

here?




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-20 02:21    [W:1.136 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site