lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: SNB PCI root information
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>>> If ACPI provides a perfectly usable generic way to describe this
>>> topology and the vendor BIOS doesn't bother to use it, I'm not very
>>> interested in trying to compensate for that BIOS deficiency by adding
>>> a bunch of non-portable CPU-specific gunk to Linux.
>>
>> The problem is that all machines get this wrong.  I've tested varies
>> models from Dell and HP and none of them have the _PXM entry and the
>> local_cpus fields are wrong.  If there is a reasonably sane way to
>> compensate for broken BIOSes it should be considered.  We all know how
>> good BIOS authors are...
>
> please check attached one. and  you may append "pci=busnum_node=00:00,80:01"
> to change node for root bus.
> assume you have two root bus: 00, 80

I'm not opposed to something like this, if people think it's useful.

This patch sets the node quite early, before we even look at the _PXM
information in pci_acpi_scan_root(). That means if the BIOS does
supply a _PXM method and the user gives this argument, the
user-supplied info is silently overwritten. To me it would make more
sense to handle an option like this *after* we look for _PXM info.
That way it could be used to compensate for both missing and incorrect
_PXM info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-19 15:21    [W:0.087 / U:11.096 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site