lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks


On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
>> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
>
> I understand your saying. Looks good.
> However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
> So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.

Greg, Alan,

any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?

Thanks,

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-19 00:21    [W:0.090 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site