Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:41:46 -0700 | From | Darren Hart <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks |
| |
On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2 >> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today. > > I understand your saying. Looks good. > However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system. > So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.
Greg, Alan,
any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?
Thanks,
-- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
| |