lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT clock bindings
    On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
    > Right. This is why I have reposted and copied those whom commented on my
    > pull request. I think at least some of Saravana's concerns boiled down
    > to not requiring using DT clock bindings and not requiring driver
    > changes to move to DT bindings. Both of these are met with this series.
    > A platform can still use clkdev tables for binding clocks to devices and
    > does not have to use DT for clocks. Drivers generally should not require
    > any changes that I'm aware of, but if there are any concrete examples
    > I'd like to know.
    >
    > Yes, I think this should go thru you.
    >
    I still have a little doubt about how this binding will best work for
    imx clock. I'm trying to cook a RFC patch discussing.

    --
    Regards,
    Shawn



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-14 11:22    [W:3.217 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site