Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:49:06 +0800 | From | Shawn Guo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT clock bindings |
| |
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Right. This is why I have reposted and copied those whom commented on my > pull request. I think at least some of Saravana's concerns boiled down > to not requiring using DT clock bindings and not requiring driver > changes to move to DT bindings. Both of these are met with this series. > A platform can still use clkdev tables for binding clocks to devices and > does not have to use DT for clocks. Drivers generally should not require > any changes that I'm aware of, but if there are any concrete examples > I'd like to know. > > Yes, I think this should go thru you. > I still have a little doubt about how this binding will best work for imx clock. I'm trying to cook a RFC patch discussing.
-- Regards, Shawn
| |