lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
Date
> On 2012.06.13 00:56 - 0700, Charles Wang wrote:

> Every cpu's load should be the load right on the time executing
> calculation.
> This is what my patch expected to do.

> After my patch, it's supposed to let every cpu's load calculation be
> independent from
> its idle and other cpus' influence when the calculation is finished.
> But it seems other problem exists.

> I recorded some trace, show as below:

Charles thanks for your detailed reply.
I am not sure I agree.

On purpose, I have left out your trace detail from this reply.
Why? Because I want to take a step back and answer a more fundamental
question first:
Is there (or was there) actually a problem that needed to be solved?

I am still not understanding what your expected reported load averages
for your 16 processes should be. How do you know that the 8 to 10 that
was being reported was incorrect?

I want to understand so that I can re-create your same reported load
averages are still to low situation on my test computer, before your patch.
Then show that it is fixed after your patch.
I have tried to re-create it and have been unsuccessful. Today, and since
you
showed at least 16 CPUs on your system, and I only have 8 CPUs, I tried with
8 processes at high duty cycle. The reported load average was always pretty
close to the actual load (see also attachment).

Perhaps I have some fundamental misunderstanding as to how reported load
averages should work. I have always used kernels compiled with
CONFIG_NO_HZ=no (tick based, rather than tickless) as the control reference.

2012.06.13 Smythies: Top showing Reported load averages and data to calculate
it manually.

.997 * 8 = 7.97 actual load

Note: the 15 minute reported load average is still lagging behind.

top - 21:22:01 up 22:53, 4 users, load average: 8.00, 7.99, 7.75
Tasks: 144 total, 9 running, 135 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 99.7%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1 : 99.7%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2 : 99.7%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3 : 99.7%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu4 : 99.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu5 : 99.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu6 : 99.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu7 : 99.7%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 7956184k total, 1093384k used, 6862800k free, 345772k buffers
Swap: 8294396k total, 0k used, 8294396k free, 386956k cached

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4743 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:43.75 waiter
4744 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:43.22 waiter
4746 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:43.77 waiter
4747 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:42.88 waiter
4748 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:43.67 waiter
4749 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:43.58 waiter
4750 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:44.06 waiter
4745 doug 20 0 4156 92 0 R 99 0.0 31:42.22 waiter
2851 doug 20 0 17332 1452 1064 S 0 0.0 2:23.77 top
4728 doug 20 0 17332 1332 960 R 0 0.0 0:07.02 top
1 root 20 0 24464 2360 1344 S 0 0.0 0:00.88 init


Loading program output:

Child 0 lp 149 of 1800: Elapsed:1951.14 s. Delta: 13.15 s. user cpu:1938.20 s. sys cpu: 0.10 s. load:0.9934 last sleep freq.: 27.376 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.492 Hz.
Child 3 lp 150 of 1800: Elapsed:1951.60 s. Delta: 13.16 s. user cpu:1938.84 s. sys cpu: 0.09 s. load:0.9935 last sleep freq.: 27.356 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.670 Hz.
Child 1 lp 151 of 1800: Elapsed:1955.15 s. Delta: 13.17 s. user cpu:1941.74 s. sys cpu: 0.05 s. load:0.9932 last sleep freq.: 27.335 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.803 Hz.
Child 6 lp 151 of 1800: Elapsed:1957.17 s. Delta: 12.74 s. user cpu:1944.34 s. sys cpu: 0.07 s. load:0.9935 last sleep freq.: 28.257 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.775 Hz.
Child 5 lp 152 of 1800: Elapsed:1957.65 s. Delta: 12.96 s. user cpu:1944.84 s. sys cpu: 0.06 s. load:0.9935 last sleep freq.: 27.778 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.952 Hz.
Child 7 lp 151 of 1800: Elapsed:1958.06 s. Delta: 12.74 s. user cpu:1945.80 s. sys cpu: 0.03 s. load:0.9938 last sleep freq.: 28.257 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.762 Hz.
Child 4 lp 152 of 1800: Elapsed:1958.47 s. Delta: 13.01 s. user cpu:1944.70 s. sys cpu: 0.06 s. load:0.9930 last sleep freq.: 27.671 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.940 Hz.
Child 2 lp 152 of 1800: Elapsed:1959.97 s. Delta: 12.75 s. user cpu:1945.56 s. sys cpu: 0.07 s. load:0.9927 last sleep freq.: 28.235 Hz. average sleep freq.: 27.919 Hz.

0.993 * 8 = 7.94 actual load
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-14 07:22    [W:0.130 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site